Monday, July 2, 2012

US manufacturing shrinks for first time in 3 years

(AP) ? U.S. manufacturing shrank in June for the first time in nearly three years, a troubling sign as evidence builds that economic growth is slowing.

The Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing managers, said Monday that its index of manufacturing activity fell to 49.7. That's down from 53.5 in May and the lowest reading since July 2009, one more after the recession officially ended. Readings below 50 indicate contraction.

Production fell to a three-year low and a measure of new orders plummeted by the most in more than a decade, suggesting the weakness will likely persist in the coming months.

Stocks, which had largely been flat when the market opened, fell immediately after the report was released at 10 a.m. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped more than 70 points in morning trading.

"This is not good. Not good at all," said Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist at BTIG, an institutional brokerage. While the report "does not mean recession for the broader economy, it is still a terribly weak number."

Manufacturing, which has helped drive growth since the Great Recession ended, has begun to falter as the U.S. job market has fizzled and global growth has weakened.

Americans have pulled back on spending, which has lowered demand for factory-made goods. Europe's economy is likely in recession, which has hurt U.S. exports. And China's manufacturing sector grew in June at its slowest pace in seven months, according to a survey released Sunday by the state-affiliated China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing

The sharp drop in U.S. factory activity overshadowed more positive news on the housing market. U.S. construction spending rose for the second straight month, although spending remains well below healthy levels.

Manufacturing is likely to stay weak for the next few months. The ISM's gauge of new orders, a good measure of future activity, plunged from 60.1 to 47.8. That's the first time it has fallen below 50 since April 2009, when the economy was still in recession.

Fewer new orders reflect growing concerns of businesses. Many are worried about growth slowing from the anemic 1.9 percent annual pace in the January-March quarter. Europe's financial crisis and the prospect that U.S. lawmakers won't extend a package of tax cuts at the end of the year have added to the uncertain outlook.

Bricklin Dwyer, an economist at BNP Paribas, said the increasing uncertainty "has left businesses unwilling to invest."

A gauge of production also fell to its lowest level in more than three years.

U.S. factories are also reporting much less overseas demand, likely because Europe's financial crisis has lowered demand for U.S. exports. A measure of exports dropped to 47.5, its lowest level since April 2009.

A gauge of employment edged down but remained at a healthy level of 56.6. That suggests factories may still be adding jobs. Manufacturers have reported job gains for eight straight months.

Factories have been a key source of jobs and growth since the recession ended almost three years ago. But the sector has shown signs of weakness in recent months.

Manufacturers produced less in May than in April, the Federal Reserve said this month. Automakers cut back on output for the first time in six months. In June, manufacturing activity barely grew in the New York region and contracted sharply in the Philadelphia area, according to surveys by regional Federal Reserve banks. Factory output ticked up in Chicago but only after sliding for three months.

Consumers are less confident in the economy than they have been at any time all year, according to a measure of consumer sentiment released Friday. Worries about slowing job growth are outweighing the benefits of lower gas prices. A separate measure of consumer confidence, issued Tuesday, showed that confidence fell for the fourth straight month.

Overall hiring has slowed sharply this spring, raising concerns about the pace of the recovery. Employers added an average of only 73,000 jobs per month in April and May. That's much lower than the average of 226,000 added in the first three months of this year. The unemployment rate rose in May to 8.2 percent from 8.1 percent, the first increase in a year.

Slower job growth and falling confidence is weighing on consumers' willingness to spend. Americans cut back on purchases of autos and other long-lasting factory goods in May, the government said Friday.

U.S. exports of manufactured goods have also suffered as Europe's financial crisis has cut into demand in that region. And slowing growth in China, India and other emerging markets means that companies in Asia and Latin America are buying fewer American-made cranes, trucks and other heavy equipment.

There have been a few good signs recently.

U.S. factories received more orders for long-lasting manufactured goods in May, the government said last week, while also noting that a key measure of business investment plans rose.

And home sales are up from last year, with prices rising in most cities and homebuilders planning to break ground on more projects in the next 12 months. That should raise demand for manufactured goods such as appliances, building materials and furniture.

Still, the Federal Reserve has cut its forecast for the year. It now expects growth of just 1.9 percent to 2.4 percent for 2012. That's half a percentage point lower than the range it estimated in April. The Fed also says unemployment won't fall much further this year than it has.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-07-02-Economy-Manufacturing/id-7d9ea0ac08ba4ab89a0f54a14a2c72e4

gunner kiel groundhog soulja boy punxsutawney phil groundhog day did the groundhog see his shadow groundhog day 2012

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Instructional technology and college education ? Exponential Book

In this op-ed on the New York Times, Jeff Solingo, editorial director of the Chronicle of Higher Education points to a few concrete, urgent actions that universities and colleges across North America should take, in order to weather the financial crisis affecting institutions of higher education.

When it comes to education, I find myself consistently siding with the ?conservatives?. It is not that I dislike change per se ? quite the opposite, if anything; and there is no reason why teaching, and more generally the way society organizes and administer the education of its youths, should not be constantly evolving, in a way mirroring cultural and economic transformations. However, I also think that due to its very importance, education is something with which we should tinker as little as possible, and only when hard evidence warrants it. Making changes to the educational system requires time (measured in decades), not only in terms of sheer implementation, but especially when it comes to assessing their effectiveness.
The damage imparted by an educational reform ultimately deemed flawed, on a number of generations, is a terrible price to pay to social experimentation. This is why education leaders and politicians should adopt a healthy skepticism, and embrace the hippocratic ?First, do no harm? motto of medicine.

Perhaps this is why I am wary of some of the recipes suggested by Solingo in his op-ed, aimed at revitalizing college and university education and bringing it up to speed with a changed world. While I can only applaud his call for reclaiming ?academics as a top priority?, with a clear reference to the seemingly uncontrolled expansion of administrative expenses, which ?have grown faster than instruction on many campuses? [0], the main point of his editorial is an exhortation to college and universities to embrace the use of technology in the classroom, as well as to offer more content online. There is a sense of urgency in Salingo?s recommendations, mostly because, according to him, universities have to ?catch up? quickly, following a decade of inaction (those dreadful nineties).

On these two points, I think that great caution should be exercised, lest we wish to go through decades of ineffective education, followed by decades during which we try and go back to the way things were. Make no mistake, I am not suggesting that the traditional model of education is perfect. It is entirely possible that classroom instruction, with which we have all grown up, that has existed for centuries and has served society well, is inexorably destined to become extinct, swept away by the information revolution that has been taking place before our eyes for the past two decades. It is entirely possible that two decades from now there will be no more classrooms, libraries, campuses, that education will be entirely online, that students everywhere will learn by watching content delivered remotely, or recorded, take tests on the internet and attend virtual graduations.

On the other hand, it is also entirely possible that none of that will happen.
Most of us agree that some, possibly a lot of human activities, will not go virtual any time soon, and may not go virtual ever, typically those based on some minimal level of interaction among individuals. And it is not as if there are no data justifying some skepticism. Online universities have existed for quite some time, and while they certainly have a place in the educational landscape, few people would contend that they represent an equally effective alternative to traditional classroom teaching.
The fact that a lot of reputable ?traditional? universities are offering more and more online courses, is no reason for every university to follow suit. Fads exist, in education like in any other human enterprise.
The experience of online realities (such as Second Life) is quite telling, in this respect. Second Life (SL) is now almost a decade old. It was launched among much hype, as a tool with the potential to open new horizons to education, commerce, research and what have you; multinationals, major high-tech firms such as Microsoft eagerly established a presence therein, for fear of being left behind what was branded as nothing short of a ?revolution? in the way business would be conducted. By now they have practically all pulled out. By all accounts, SL itself is in a state of abandon, after failing to deliver upon its promises; this is a telltale sign of the great challenges that going virtual poses.

While I agree that internet technology has a place in the broader context of college education, I remain convinced that campus-based institutions should make use of it sparingly, mostly as an aid to classroom-based instruction. Instead of trying to compete with them (a race to the bottom that traditional universities simply cannot win), universities should clearly differentiate themselves from for-profit online diploma mills. Great emphasis should be placed on the difference between learning and obtaining a degree, and on the superior educational experience of classroom-based instruction. The day we, academics, no longer believe that sitting in a classroom, listening to a person explain, to the questions from fellow students, is the best way to learn, then we will know that universities as we know them have come to the end of the line. But until then, until hard data convincingly show that students learn more by going online instead of going to school, there is no reason for universities to try to increase online course content beyond what they are all already doing, other than to keep up with a fad.

Some goes for instructional technology. At this point in time, at least in North America the use of computer technology in and out of the classroom, for example, is no novelty anymore. I was an enthusiastic early adopter in 1996, and have made extensive use of it myself since, and while I am the first to admit that it renders some aspects of teaching easier, chiefly the running and administration of large-enrolment courses, its real effectiveness in terms of content delivery and learning should not be exaggerated.
My personal observation is that students do not learn more and/or more quickly just because widgets, movies, animations, online lecture notes and power point presentations are put at their fingertips. None of these things are replacements for attending lectures, reading the textbook, thinking about concepts on one?s own, discussing them with instructors and fellow students, doing the homework. Students who are willing to put the time, do well, those who are not do not ? no technology will change that state of affairs (if that is being ?conservative?, fine, call me one).

Notes

[0] If anything, I wish that Solingo had devoted a much greater share of his editorial to this aspect, seeing by many of us as the most important issue with modern time academia (see here for instance) instead of a single, cautious paragraph, bordering on the perfunctory.

Tags: Academia, Physics, Science, Science Education, Teaching

Source: http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/instructional-technology-and-college-education/

hallmark grammy winners obama budget woolly mammoth belize resorts nikki minaj grammy performance shel silverstein

Mobile Miscellany: week of June 25th, 2012

Mobile Miscellany week of June 25th, 2012

Not all mobile news is destined for the front page, but if you're like us and really want to know what's going on, then you've come to the right place. This past week, Samsung introduced its first Windows Phone for China and both HTC and Samsung each chimed in about Android 4.1 -- the sweet treat better known as Jelly Bean. These stories and more await after the break. So buy the ticket and take the ride as we explore the "best of the rest" for this week of June 25th, 2012.

Continue reading Mobile Miscellany: week of June 25th, 2012

Mobile Miscellany: week of June 25th, 2012 originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/30/mobile-miscellany-week-of-june-25th-2012/

colts colts big ten tournament 2012 dennis quaid bruce weber fired notorious big biggie smalls lyrics

Gamestop taking pre-orders for Google's Nexus 7 tablet

GAMESTOP TAKING PRE-ORDERS ON NEW GOOGLE NEXUS 7 TABLET

Trades of popular Android tablets now accepted in all U.S. stores

GameStop (NYSE: GME), the world's largest multichannel retailer of video games, has again expanded its mobile electronics business with new trade-in and pre-order programs. The company is now accepting trades on a wide range of Android tablets and is taking pre-orders on the brand new Google Nexus 7 tablet (16GB). The Nexus 7, which was just announced at Google's I/O developer conference, is the first tablet to feature the latest Android OS ? Jelly Bean ? and will be available for $249 in mid-July. Consumers can pre-order the Nexus 7 at all U.S. GameStop stores and online at www.GameStop.com.

For a limited time, the Nexus 7 includes $25 of credit to spend in the Google Play store, as well as some great free content like your own copy of Transformers: Dark of the Moon. GameStop customers can also take advantage of a 30% trade bonus on all items traded towards the pre-order of the Nexus 7. This includes trades of video game hardware, software and accessories as well as iDevices and eligible Android tablets.

"We've seen great consumer enthusiasm for our recommerce initiatives, particularly our iDevice trade program that launched last fall," stated GameStop president Tony Bartel. "With the increasing popularity of Android tablets and the emerging multiscreen gaming trend, this is the ideal time to expand the program to meet the needs of our hybrid customers."

For consumers looking to trade in an Android tablet, all U.S. GameStop stores are now offering instant cash or in-store credit for Android tablets from a variety of top brands. Trade values, ranging up to $250 in-store credit or $200 cash, are based on model, memory size and physical condition. GameStop also offers a recycling option to help consumers properly dispose of non-working or damaged tablets.

To learn more about GameStop's latest tablet offerings, visit www.GameStop.com/Tablets.

Source: http://www.joystiq.com/2012/06/29/gamestop-taking-pre-orders-for-googles-nexus-7-tablet/

danica patrick school closings top chef texas rail gun harrisburg great pacific garbage patch ben affleck and jennifer garner

What is the purpose of a Supreme Court? (Unqualified Offerings)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/236174246?client_source=feed&format=rss

dragnet immaculate conception immaculate conception rule 5 draft lindsay lohan playboy cover lindsay lohan playboy cover shooting at virginia tech

Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max


The Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max ($6,995 direct) is a professional-class workstation built for speed. In this incarnation, it's a niche product, made for video editors and other video pros. With other components, it can be tuned for CAD, math, and 3D rendering as well. The HD180 Max comes with a six-core Intel Core i7 processor, lots of speedy DDR3 memory, SSDs, an Nvidia Quadro graphics card, and an Nvidia Tesla GPU coprocessor card. All of it together will make Premiere Pro fans happy.

Design and Features
The ProMagix HD180 Max is built into one of Velocity Micro's larger chassis. As such, it has the room inside for the Intel Core i7-3930k processor (and huge air cooled heat sink), 32GB of DDR3 memory (and room for more), two 120GB SSDs, 2TB hard drive, Nvidia Quadro 4000 graphics card, Nvidia Tesla C2075 GPU coprocessor card, Blu-ray burner, and the 1,200W power supply. The case door is windowed, so you can see into the system and show off the extra Nvidia Tesla coprocessor card. Aside from the window, the rest of the system looks every bit the professional workstation.

The visible Quadro graphics card and Tesla GPU coprocessor cards are your visual cues that the system means business. Inside the chassis, there's a bunch of room left over for up to two more Tesla cards, as well as another graphics card (at least physically). The system can accommodate two more hard drives and two more optical drives, and thankfully there are four free SATA ports on the motherboard. Outside, the system can be connected to quite a few peripherals with the eight USB 2.0 ports, two USB 3.0 ports, and a FireWire 400 port. You can add a PCIe card for more USB 3.0 ports, but it would've been nice to have more than two. Thunderbolt is notably missing, but the motherboards with built-in Thunderbolt ports are somewhat scarce, as are add-on cards. This particular configuration is appealing for the same type of users that will welcome the added speedy external storage found in a Thunderbolt drive, i.e. video editors and mastering folk.

The desktop came free of any bloatware, as is usual for Velocity Micro's custom built PCs. You really don't want to have to deal with uninstalling extraneous software when all you want to do is work on editing and transcoding your Citizen Kane. The system we reviewed came with Windows 7 Professional 64-bit, the Nvidia drivers for the GPUs, and that's about it. The system comes with a 1-year standard warranty, which is a bit short for such an expensive system. You can purchase an extended warranty at added cost, but workstations from the competition like the single-processor workstation Editors' Choice Dell Precision T1600 ($2,185 direct, 4.5 stars) come with a three-year warranty standard.

Performance
Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max The reason you buy a workstation is for performance and reliability. The reliability is covered by the 1,200W power supply and the professional-grade Nvidia cards. The Nvidia cards also provide a performance boost, particularly on tasks that take advantage of GPU optimization like the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE) built into Adobe Premiere CS5.5 and CS6. MPE uses the system's RAM, the GPUs in the Quadro and Tesla cards, and Nvidia's CUDA programming language to speed tasks that would otherwise be time consuming. For example, using the PPBM CS5.5 benchmark test run in Premiere Pro CS6, the ProMagix took only 5 seconds to complete the standard MPE-optimized test. The high-end Velocity Micro Raptor Z90 ($4,999 direct, 3.5 stars) without a Tesla co-processor, which took a much longer 43 seconds. This task is a huge argument for adding the Tesla co-processor to an (relatively) inexpensive non-Xeon processor. The test file was only minutes in length, so imagine the difference if you were mastering a multi-hour-long documentary.

The HD180 Max was quite fast on our regular multimedia benchmark tests as well. The system took a scant 1:06 to complete our Handbrake video transcode test and 2:49 to complete the Photoshop CS5 test. This is faster than the dual Xeon processor-equipped Lenovo ThinkStation D20 ($9,344 direct, 4 stars) (1:19 in Handbrake, 3:09 in Photoshop) as well as the current Editors' Choice Dell Precision T1600 (1:13 in Handbrake, 2:57 in Photoshop). It's no slouch on day to day tasks either, as the HD180 Max's 5,474 point score on PCMark7 was one of the highest we've recorded for any PC. In fact, the HD180 Max won most of the benchmark tests when compared with other professional-grade workstations.

The Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max is an excellent professional workstation for video editors in particular, and graphics arts professionals in general. It comes highly recommended for the type of user that will take advantage of the GPU processing power, like users in the indie film scene working to meet a release date. However, for more enterprise-based users in mainstream Hollywood, we still recommend the high-end workstation Editors' Choice Lenovo ThinkStation C20 ($4,618 direct, 4.0 stars), ThinkStation D20, and their ThinkStation cousins for their enterprise-friendly serviceability, ISV certifications, and IT connections.

BENCHMARK TEST RESULTS

COMPARISON TABLE
Compare the Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max with several other desktops side by side.

More desktop reviews:
??? Velocity Micro ProMagix HD180 Max
??? Falcon Northwest Tiki
??? Polywell Poly i1000A-3770T
??? Samsung Series 3 Chromebox (XE300M22)
??? Sony VAIO L24 (SVL24114FXB)
?? more

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ziffdavis/pcmag/~3/S0xZCuuVaBo/0,2817,2406550,00.asp

ncaa tournament marchmadness mike d antoni nba trade rumors 2012 ncaa tournament schedule laurent robinson dantoni

Scientists develop flush-efficient toilet system that can turn waste into energy, sort before it recycles

Scientists develop flush-efficient toilet system that can turn waste into energy, sort before it recycles

Scientists from Singapore's Nanyang Technological University aren't keen on being wasteful -- that's why they've developed a toilet that uses 90% less water than other commodes and is capable of generating energy. Aptly named the No-Mix Vacuum Toilet, the porcelain pedestal's pot divides waste between two partitions -- one side for liquids, the other for solids -- and uses vacuum tech reminiscent of airline lavatories. Flushing solid and fluid wastes with 1 and 0.2 liters of H2O, respectively, the can will be able to route refuse to external processing facilities. Fertilizer ingredients such as nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous would then be harvested from liquids. Similarly, methane can be coaxed from solids for conversion to electricity or as a replacement for other natural gasses. Two of the university's restrooms are slated to have the toilets installed in the near future, and the team expects the thrones to roll out worldwide within three years.

[Thanks, Yuka]

Scientists develop flush-efficient toilet system that can turn waste into energy, sort before it recycles originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Inhabitat  |  sourceNanyang Technological University  | Email this | Comments


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/68ohkIOaQic/

what time does the super bowl start ben gazzara nfl hall of fame 2012 ufc diaz vs condit josephine baker super bowl start time target jason wu